The Mediating Factors on the relationship between Social Factors and Female Administrators? Leadership in Public high schools under Shenyang City

Authors

  • Li Yuehua Educational Faculty of Bangkokthonburi University
  • Sataporn Pruettikul Educational Faculty of Bangkokthonburi University
  • Sutida Howattanakul Educational Faculty of Bangkokthonburi University

Keywords:

Female managers' leadership, Social factors, Mediating, public high school

Abstract

The objectives of this research were: (1) To study the components on the Female administrators' Leadership in high schools under Shenyang city. (2) To develop the model of mediating factors between social factors and Female administrators' Leadership in high schools in Shenyang city. And (3) To decompose mediating factors of the social factors affecting on female administrators' leadership in public high schools in Shenyang city. The population were administrators' and teachers in public high schools determined by G*Power software, total 2,862 and used stratified random sampling method for 212. The data analyzed by statistical software including descriptive statistics, confirmatory factor analysis, and structural equation model.

The research found that; (1) The leadership of female administrators' consist of 5 components mainly; thinking ability, organizational ability and decision-making ability; (2) Personal factors, Ffamily factors and Oorganizational factors had positive effect on female administrators' leadership with statistical significant (p<.05), and play an intermediary role between social factors and female administrators' leadership; ?And (3) The mediating effect of intermediary factors could be reduce the direct effect of social factors on the leadership of female administrators at 59%.

References

Bandura A. (1986). Social foundation of thought and action: A social cognitive theory Englewood Cliffs. NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Bentler, P. M., & Chou, C. H. 1987. Practical Issues in Structural Modeling. Journal of Sociological Methods & Research, 16(1): 78 - 117.

Browne, M. W., and Cudeck, R. (1993). ?Alternative ways of assessing model fit,? in Testing Structural Equation Models. eds K. A. Bollen and J. S. Long (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage), 136?162.

Chen, H. (2019). Research on the leadership of female teachers in colleges and universities from the perspective of social support. Master's thesis, Shenzhen University, CNKI http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10590-1021811692.htm

Diamantopoulos, A. & Siguaw, J. A., (2000). Introduction to LISREL: A guide for the uninitiated. London: SAGE Publications, Inc,

Fornell, C., Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39?50.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E., (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspectives. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, International.

Hu, L., and Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychol. Methods 3:424. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.424

Mueller, R. O. (1996). Basic principles of structural equation modeling: An introduction to LISREL and EQS. New York: Springer.

Sarason, T.G., Levine, H.M., Basham, R.B., & Sarason,B.R. (1983). Azzessing Social support: The social support Questionnaires. Journal of Personallity and Social Psycology, 44, 127-139.

Published

2024-06-26

Most read articles by the same author(s)